Review



sequence shrna  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology sequence shrna
    a Schematic <t>of</t> <t>Gck</t> virogenetic <t>shRNA</t> or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.
    Sequence Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1290 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Control+shRNA+Lentiviral+Particles-A/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__13__710876-267-18-22
    Average 96 stars, based on 1290 article reviews
    sequence shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates"

    Article Title: An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.13.710876

    a Schematic of Gck virogenetic shRNA or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic of Gck virogenetic shRNA or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.

    Techniques Used: shRNA, Control, Concentration Assay, Expressing

    a Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam, Gck, and Tas1r3 in control (n= 4) and MGAM KD (n=4) in TRPM5+ mice c Schematic of burst structure (period of continuous licks separated by <1s) and time frame d Schematic of 300 lick test of 0.6M maltose in lickometer. e Schematical graph showing relationship between burst size and hedonic value. f Mean (±SEM) burst size, burst number, total licks for 300 lick test in control (n=3) and MGAM KD (n=3) in TRPM5+ mice (*:p<0.05). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in .
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam, Gck, and Tas1r3 in control (n= 4) and MGAM KD (n=4) in TRPM5+ mice c Schematic of burst structure (period of continuous licks separated by <1s) and time frame d Schematic of 300 lick test of 0.6M maltose in lickometer. e Schematical graph showing relationship between burst size and hedonic value. f Mean (±SEM) burst size, burst number, total licks for 300 lick test in control (n=3) and MGAM KD (n=3) in TRPM5+ mice (*:p<0.05). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in .

    Techniques Used: Control, shRNA, Expressing

    a Schematic depicting T1R2+T1R3 sweet receptor transgenic knockout mouse. b Mean transcript expression of Gck and Mgam for sugar naive (n=4) and sugar exposed (n=4) T1RKO. c Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. d Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. e Block 1 mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=5) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and MGAM KD for first block (5/group). g Schematic of brief access taste test of glucose and fructose in lickometer. h First block mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M glucose and fructose in control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. i First block glucose and fructose mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 7.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic depicting T1R2+T1R3 sweet receptor transgenic knockout mouse. b Mean transcript expression of Gck and Mgam for sugar naive (n=4) and sugar exposed (n=4) T1RKO. c Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. d Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. e Block 1 mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=5) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and MGAM KD for first block (5/group). g Schematic of brief access taste test of glucose and fructose in lickometer. h First block mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M glucose and fructose in control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. i First block glucose and fructose mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 7.

    Techniques Used: Transgenic Assay, Knock-Out, Expressing, Control, shRNA, Blocking Assay, Concentration Assay

    a Schematic showing control, Gck, and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of 1000 lick test of mixed nutrient solution (Peptamen) in lickometer for pre-surgery and post-surgery. c Mean total licks for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. d Mean meal duration for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. e Mean burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. f Mean burst number for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. g Mean (±SEM) cumulative first 15 burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. (n=12/group for all tests) (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 8.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic showing control, Gck, and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of 1000 lick test of mixed nutrient solution (Peptamen) in lickometer for pre-surgery and post-surgery. c Mean total licks for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. d Mean meal duration for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. e Mean burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. f Mean burst number for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. g Mean (±SEM) cumulative first 15 burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. (n=12/group for all tests) (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 8.

    Techniques Used: Control, shRNA

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: To identify the effects of genetic knockdown of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-actin (a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid number 21948)) at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. .. After a 2-day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 × 10 3 viral particles/μl) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer's protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2- day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Transduction:

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: To identify the effects of genetic knockdown of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-actin (a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid number 21948)) at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. .. After a 2-day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 × 10 3 viral particles/μl) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer's protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2- day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Control:

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: To identify the effects of genetic knockdown of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-actin (a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid number 21948)) at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. .. After a 2-day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 × 10 3 viral particles/μl) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer's protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2- day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Infection:

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: To identify the effects of genetic knockdown of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-actin (a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid number 21948)) at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. .. After a 2-day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 × 10 3 viral particles/μl) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer's protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..

    Article Title: Inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates dendritic arborization and spine maturation of cultured hippocampal neurons
    Article Snippet: Transfection and CARM1 gene silencing— To identify the effects of genetic knock-down of CARM1 on dendritic morphology and synaptic clustering of synapsin, NR2B, and PSD-95, hippocampal neurons were first transfected with the construct pCAG-mGFP-Actin [a gift from Ryohei Yasuda (Addgene plasmid # 21948)] at 7 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. .. After a 2- day incubation, neurons were untreated or transduced with rat CARM1- or PRMT1-specific siRNA or scrambled control siRNA lentiviral particles (5 x 10 3 viral particles/μl, Santa Cruz) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4 to ensure efficient infection following the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by overnight incubation. ..



    Similar Products

    94
    OriGene control shrna lentiviral particles
    Control Shrna Lentiviral Particles, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Chymotrypsin+like+protease+(CTRL)+Human+shRNA+Lentiviral+Particle/pm42127012-61-7-18
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control shrna lentiviral particles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    OriGene shrna
    Shrna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Lentiviral+Control+Particles/pmc13171111-412-41-45
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    OriGene non targeting scrambled shrna
    Non Targeting Scrambled Shrna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Lentiviral+Control+Particles/pmc13004431-53-1-9
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    non targeting scrambled shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology sequence shrna
    a Schematic <t>of</t> <t>Gck</t> virogenetic <t>shRNA</t> or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.
    Sequence Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Control+shRNA+Lentiviral+Particles-A/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__13__710876-267-18-22
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sequence shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology scrambled shrna
    a Schematic <t>of</t> <t>Gck</t> virogenetic <t>shRNA</t> or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.
    Scrambled Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/Control+shRNA+Lentiviral+Particles-A/pm41813854-218-45-49
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    scrambled shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology control gfp shrna
    a Schematic <t>of</t> <t>Gck</t> virogenetic <t>shRNA</t> or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.
    Control Gfp Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/copGFP+Control+Lentiviral+Particles/10__3390_slash_biom16020240-87-12-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control gfp shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology control shrna lentiviral particles
    L-plastin downregulation decreases the number of cells connected by TNTs. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot demonstrating successful downregulation of L-plastin protein levels in <t>shRNA-L-plastin</t> cells compared to the shRNA-Control. ( c ) Quantification of L-plastin downregulation from Western blots shows a 77.2% downregulation in L-plastin expression (22.8 ± 6.48) compared to control cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0121). ( d ) Top Z-stack representative 3D image of control shRNA transduced cells and ( e ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( d ). ( f ) Representative 3D image of shRNA L-plastin transduced cells and ( g ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( f ). TNTs are highlighted with white arrowheads and cells connected by TNTs are identified with a white star (*). Scale bars for ( d , f ) = 10 μm and 5 μm for ( e , g ). Scale bars = 5 μm. ( h ) Down regulation of L-plastin resulted in a significantly lower percentage of cells connected by TNT (32.7 ± 4.7%) compared to the shRNA-control cells (51.2 ± 3.8%). The quantification of cells connected by TNTs came from 5 blinded independent experiments ( n = 520 for shRNA Ctl and n = 508 for shRNA L-plastin). Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0214). * p < 0.05.
    Control Shrna Lentiviral Particles, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+sirna+lentiviral+particles/L-Plastin+siRNA/pmc12897106-54-12-16
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control shrna lentiviral particles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Schematic of Gck virogenetic shRNA or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.13.710876

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic of Gck virogenetic shRNA or control shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. c Mean (±SEM) lick score of 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=11) and GCK KD (n=12) TRPM5+. d Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5+ (11-12/group). e Mean (±SEM) 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=10) and GCK KD (n=11) TRPM5-. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and GCK KD TRPM5- (10-11/group). g Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam for B6 (n=8), TRPM5+ (n=8) and TRPM5- (n=9). h Mean (±SEM) relative MGAM transcript for B6 sugar naïve (n=2), glucose experience (n=5), fructose experience (n=6), or glucose + fructose experience(n=5). (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01,***:p<0.001,****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 3.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction rate; 2-3% maintenance rate, as needed) to receive a scrambled sequence shRNA (Control, sc-108080, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GCK shRNA (sc-35459-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Maltase-Glucoamylase shRNA (m) (sc-75741-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: shRNA, Control, Concentration Assay, Expressing

    a Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam, Gck, and Tas1r3 in control (n= 4) and MGAM KD (n=4) in TRPM5+ mice c Schematic of burst structure (period of continuous licks separated by <1s) and time frame d Schematic of 300 lick test of 0.6M maltose in lickometer. e Schematical graph showing relationship between burst size and hedonic value. f Mean (±SEM) burst size, burst number, total licks for 300 lick test in control (n=3) and MGAM KD (n=3) in TRPM5+ mice (*:p<0.05). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in .

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.13.710876

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Mean relative transcript expression of Mgam, Gck, and Tas1r3 in control (n= 4) and MGAM KD (n=4) in TRPM5+ mice c Schematic of burst structure (period of continuous licks separated by <1s) and time frame d Schematic of 300 lick test of 0.6M maltose in lickometer. e Schematical graph showing relationship between burst size and hedonic value. f Mean (±SEM) burst size, burst number, total licks for 300 lick test in control (n=3) and MGAM KD (n=3) in TRPM5+ mice (*:p<0.05). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in .

    Article Snippet: Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction rate; 2-3% maintenance rate, as needed) to receive a scrambled sequence shRNA (Control, sc-108080, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GCK shRNA (sc-35459-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Maltase-Glucoamylase shRNA (m) (sc-75741-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Control, shRNA, Expressing

    a Schematic depicting T1R2+T1R3 sweet receptor transgenic knockout mouse. b Mean transcript expression of Gck and Mgam for sugar naive (n=4) and sugar exposed (n=4) T1RKO. c Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. d Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. e Block 1 mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=5) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and MGAM KD for first block (5/group). g Schematic of brief access taste test of glucose and fructose in lickometer. h First block mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M glucose and fructose in control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. i First block glucose and fructose mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 7.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.13.710876

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic depicting T1R2+T1R3 sweet receptor transgenic knockout mouse. b Mean transcript expression of Gck and Mgam for sugar naive (n=4) and sugar exposed (n=4) T1RKO. c Schematic of control and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. d Schematic of brief access taste test of maltose and sucrose in lickometer. e Block 1 mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M maltose and sucrose in control (n=5) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. f Mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control and MGAM KD for first block (5/group). g Schematic of brief access taste test of glucose and fructose in lickometer. h First block mean (±SEM) lick scores for 0.316M, 0.56M, 1.1M glucose and fructose in control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. i First block glucose and fructose mean lick scores averaged across concentration for control (n=6) and MGAM KD (n=5) T1RKO. All tests were conducted in the Davis Rig. (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 7.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction rate; 2-3% maintenance rate, as needed) to receive a scrambled sequence shRNA (Control, sc-108080, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GCK shRNA (sc-35459-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Maltase-Glucoamylase shRNA (m) (sc-75741-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Transgenic Assay, Knock-Out, Expressing, Control, shRNA, Blocking Assay, Concentration Assay

    a Schematic showing control, Gck, and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of 1000 lick test of mixed nutrient solution (Peptamen) in lickometer for pre-surgery and post-surgery. c Mean total licks for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. d Mean meal duration for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. e Mean burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. f Mean burst number for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. g Mean (±SEM) cumulative first 15 burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. (n=12/group for all tests) (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 8.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An enzymatic–metabolic sensing axis in taste cells detects glucose-yielding carbohydrates

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.13.710876

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic showing control, Gck, and Mgam virogenetic shRNA silencing surgery in the major taste fields of the tongue. b Schematic of 1000 lick test of mixed nutrient solution (Peptamen) in lickometer for pre-surgery and post-surgery. c Mean total licks for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. d Mean meal duration for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. e Mean burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. f Mean burst number for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. g Mean (±SEM) cumulative first 15 burst size for 1000 lick test in control, GCK KD, MGAM KD pre-test vs post-test. (n=12/group for all tests) (*:p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001, ****:p<0.0001). All tests were conducted in the gustometer. Statistical Analysis are in Supplementary Table 8.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction rate; 2-3% maintenance rate, as needed) to receive a scrambled sequence shRNA (Control, sc-108080, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GCK shRNA (sc-35459-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Maltase-Glucoamylase shRNA (m) (sc-75741-V, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Control, shRNA

    L-plastin downregulation decreases the number of cells connected by TNTs. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot demonstrating successful downregulation of L-plastin protein levels in shRNA-L-plastin cells compared to the shRNA-Control. ( c ) Quantification of L-plastin downregulation from Western blots shows a 77.2% downregulation in L-plastin expression (22.8 ± 6.48) compared to control cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0121). ( d ) Top Z-stack representative 3D image of control shRNA transduced cells and ( e ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( d ). ( f ) Representative 3D image of shRNA L-plastin transduced cells and ( g ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( f ). TNTs are highlighted with white arrowheads and cells connected by TNTs are identified with a white star (*). Scale bars for ( d , f ) = 10 μm and 5 μm for ( e , g ). Scale bars = 5 μm. ( h ) Down regulation of L-plastin resulted in a significantly lower percentage of cells connected by TNT (32.7 ± 4.7%) compared to the shRNA-control cells (51.2 ± 3.8%). The quantification of cells connected by TNTs came from 5 blinded independent experiments ( n = 520 for shRNA Ctl and n = 508 for shRNA L-plastin). Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0214). * p < 0.05.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Myosin-X Acts Upstream of L-Plastin to Drive Stress-Induced Tunneling Nanotubes

    doi: 10.3390/cells15030224

    Figure Lengend Snippet: L-plastin downregulation decreases the number of cells connected by TNTs. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot demonstrating successful downregulation of L-plastin protein levels in shRNA-L-plastin cells compared to the shRNA-Control. ( c ) Quantification of L-plastin downregulation from Western blots shows a 77.2% downregulation in L-plastin expression (22.8 ± 6.48) compared to control cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0121). ( d ) Top Z-stack representative 3D image of control shRNA transduced cells and ( e ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( d ). ( f ) Representative 3D image of shRNA L-plastin transduced cells and ( g ) Zoom in of ROI outlined in (dashed rectangles) ( f ). TNTs are highlighted with white arrowheads and cells connected by TNTs are identified with a white star (*). Scale bars for ( d , f ) = 10 μm and 5 μm for ( e , g ). Scale bars = 5 μm. ( h ) Down regulation of L-plastin resulted in a significantly lower percentage of cells connected by TNT (32.7 ± 4.7%) compared to the shRNA-control cells (51.2 ± 3.8%). The quantification of cells connected by TNTs came from 5 blinded independent experiments ( n = 520 for shRNA Ctl and n = 508 for shRNA L-plastin). Graph show means (±s.e.m; p = 0.0214). * p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: For down regulation experiments, Myo10 shRNA (SCBT, sc-43242-V), L-plastin shRNA (SCBT, sc-43209-V), control shRNA lentiviral particles (SCBT, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-108060), Polybrene (sc-134220) reagent and puromycin dihydrochloride (Santa Cruz, sc-108071) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Staining, Control, Western Blot, shRNA, Expressing

    L-plastin expression levels dos not affect Myo10 expression. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot showing up-regulation of L-plastin expression and its effect on Myo10 protein levels. ( c ) Quantitative analysis showing no statistical significant changes (ns) in Myo10 expression (92.8% ± 2.3%; p = 0.9203) upon L-plastin upregulation. ( d , e ) Stain free gel and Western blot from a,b showing successful down-regulation of L-plastin (~70 KDa) in ShRNA L-plastin cells. To see its effect on Myo10 expression, the top part of the blot was probed with Myo10 antibody to determine the effect of L-plastin down regulation on Myo10 protein levels (~250 KDa). ( f ) Quantification of relative levels of Myo 10 expression shows no significant changes (96.4%; (ns) with p = 0.1443) compared to control cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments, and the graph shows means (±s.e.m).

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Myosin-X Acts Upstream of L-Plastin to Drive Stress-Induced Tunneling Nanotubes

    doi: 10.3390/cells15030224

    Figure Lengend Snippet: L-plastin expression levels dos not affect Myo10 expression. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot showing up-regulation of L-plastin expression and its effect on Myo10 protein levels. ( c ) Quantitative analysis showing no statistical significant changes (ns) in Myo10 expression (92.8% ± 2.3%; p = 0.9203) upon L-plastin upregulation. ( d , e ) Stain free gel and Western blot from a,b showing successful down-regulation of L-plastin (~70 KDa) in ShRNA L-plastin cells. To see its effect on Myo10 expression, the top part of the blot was probed with Myo10 antibody to determine the effect of L-plastin down regulation on Myo10 protein levels (~250 KDa). ( f ) Quantification of relative levels of Myo 10 expression shows no significant changes (96.4%; (ns) with p = 0.1443) compared to control cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments, and the graph shows means (±s.e.m).

    Article Snippet: For down regulation experiments, Myo10 shRNA (SCBT, sc-43242-V), L-plastin shRNA (SCBT, sc-43209-V), control shRNA lentiviral particles (SCBT, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-108060), Polybrene (sc-134220) reagent and puromycin dihydrochloride (Santa Cruz, sc-108071) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Control, Western Blot, shRNA

    Myo10 expression levels affect L-plastin expression. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot showing that down-regulation of Myo10 expression (61.0% ± 2.4% with p = 0.0121) using shRNA lentiviral particles ( c ) results in the reduction of L-plastin expression levels to 68% (±2.8%; p -value: 0.0121). Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. ( d ) Conversely, we looked at the effects of up-regulation of Myo10 using transient GFP-Myo10 transfection. ( e ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. To avoid that the very bright GFP signal affects the endogenous Myo10 signal, the GFP-vector experiments were loaded first, followed by the GFP-Myo10 transfected cells on the same gels. Here a representative experiment is shown, where the control lane (GFP-vector) and its matching experimental lane (GFP-Myo10) from the same gel were juxtaposed as shown by the black separation lane. The entire gel is shown in ; lanes 1 ( e ) and 4 ( f ) were used as a representative image here. ( f ) Representative fluorescent Western blot of the same samples as ( e ) are shown and it demonstrates that up-regulation of GFP-Myo10 expression results in the upregulation of endogenous L-plastin expression. ( g ) Quantitative analysis shows a 132.3.3% (±9.4%; p = 0.0121) increase in L-plastin in cells over-expressing GFP-Myo10 compared to the control GFP expressing cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Myosin-X Acts Upstream of L-Plastin to Drive Stress-Induced Tunneling Nanotubes

    doi: 10.3390/cells15030224

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Myo10 expression levels affect L-plastin expression. ( a ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. ( b ) Representative fluorescent Western blot showing that down-regulation of Myo10 expression (61.0% ± 2.4% with p = 0.0121) using shRNA lentiviral particles ( c ) results in the reduction of L-plastin expression levels to 68% (±2.8%; p -value: 0.0121). Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. ( d ) Conversely, we looked at the effects of up-regulation of Myo10 using transient GFP-Myo10 transfection. ( e ) Representative stain free gel is shown as a loading control. To avoid that the very bright GFP signal affects the endogenous Myo10 signal, the GFP-vector experiments were loaded first, followed by the GFP-Myo10 transfected cells on the same gels. Here a representative experiment is shown, where the control lane (GFP-vector) and its matching experimental lane (GFP-Myo10) from the same gel were juxtaposed as shown by the black separation lane. The entire gel is shown in ; lanes 1 ( e ) and 4 ( f ) were used as a representative image here. ( f ) Representative fluorescent Western blot of the same samples as ( e ) are shown and it demonstrates that up-regulation of GFP-Myo10 expression results in the upregulation of endogenous L-plastin expression. ( g ) Quantitative analysis shows a 132.3.3% (±9.4%; p = 0.0121) increase in L-plastin in cells over-expressing GFP-Myo10 compared to the control GFP expressing cells. Data are the average of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: For down regulation experiments, Myo10 shRNA (SCBT, sc-43242-V), L-plastin shRNA (SCBT, sc-43209-V), control shRNA lentiviral particles (SCBT, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-108060), Polybrene (sc-134220) reagent and puromycin dihydrochloride (Santa Cruz, sc-108071) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Control, Western Blot, shRNA, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation